According to Wikipedia Founder's syndrome (also founderitis)
is a popular term for a difficulty faced by organizations where one or more
founders maintain disproportionate power and influence following the effective initial
establishment of the project, leading to a wide range of problems for both the
organization and those involved in it. The passion and charisma of the founder or founders, which was such an
important reason for the successful establishment of the organization, becomes
a limiting and destructive force, rather than the creative and productive one
it was in the early stages
For those Founders still in office… this post is for
you..
What
Founders Need to Know by Hildy Gottlieb
We use two analogies
to describe our relationship to the organization we founded. We try not to mix
these metaphors, but sometimes it happens. Here goes:
- Once you have birthed it, it is no longer your baby. Just as it is with our own children, once they are born, they are their own persons. We can guide our children, teach them, nurture them - but our son or daughter is a person in his/her own right. As is “our” organization. It’s not ours. It is its own thing. We don’t own it.
- Once you give a gift, it’s no longer yours. Ok - that’s the other metaphor. We have created this amazing gift for our community. Now that it is used and depended upon by others - now that we have given this gift to the community, it is no longer ours. It belongs to the community. That’s the definition of a gift.
From these two facts
- that the organization is a being in its own right, and that that being
belongs to the community, not us - come a number of other facts many founders
don’t want to face.
1) Along with the decision to bring a child into the world comes
the responsibility to raise it to live independently. We all know the old adage - that the
only certainties in life are death and taxes. Well the part we don’t like to
admit to ourselves is that there is another certainty associated with the
“death” part - and that is that none of us knows exactly when our days will be
done. Because we know we are not going to live forever, and we cannot know if
our last day will be tomorrow or 50 years from now, it is irresponsible to run
our organizations as if we will, in fact, be around forever. It is simply not
fair to the organization, nor to those who benefit from the work we do. The
only responsible approach, therefore, is to raise this child to NOT need us.
2) The world doesn’t owe you anything for having founded your
organization. We gave up our lives
to create the organization we founded. We went without sleep, sweated blood,
and in our case, even went into debt. But the sad truth is that nobody owes us
anything for doing that. We did it because we cared. And regardless of which
metaphor you use - that of having a child, or that of giving a gift - neither
of them provides for a payback. Our “payback” in having a child is in seeing
our children grow and take on the world themselves. And our “payback” for
giving a gift is in seeing how happy the recipient is to use that gift, hopefully
for a long long time.
3) It’s not about you. Harsh, but true. It’s hard sometimes to acknowledge that
regardless of how much we put into nurturing the organization we founded, in
the long run, none of that really matters. It’s not about our emotional needs -
regardless of what those are. It’s not about what we’ve sacrificed to make it
all work, or the recognition / gratitude we think we should get. It’s about the
community, which is why we created this gift in the first place. If we have not
prepared the organization to survive (and dare I say thrive?) without our
presence, and we therefore cannot even think of leaving, as the organization
would crumble without us, then we have somehow made it about us, rather than
about the community.
4) Your vision isn’t nearly as important as the organization’s
vision and the community’s vision. Yes, it was our vision that founded the organization in the
first place. But as the organization grows and matures, that vision may not be
all there is. The ability for the organization to dramatically affect the
community may be far larger than the vision we had when we first opened the
doors. Doing things the way they’ve always been done, and thinking the way
things have always been thought is not necessarily the best thing for the
organization, nor for the community it serves. It is simply what WE would do.
So if we fear the vision would change if we weren’t there, perhaps it’s time to
let it evolve while we are still present.